Legal Opinion

State v. Buchanan

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1953No. 7881PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIVENS, Justice.

Appellant assigns in substance three errors: first, that the record affirmatively shows no criminal complaint or warrant of arrest was ever filed in this action, or preliminary proceedings had before a magistrate. Such asserted lack or defect was in no way brought to the attention of the -trial court and appellant’s assertion in this regard appears for the first time in his brief.

The commitment, information and cross examination of witnesses as to their testimony at the preliminary examination, show a preliminary examination was held.

The only purpose of a warrant is to bring…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. State v. MoonIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State v. KleierIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  3. State v. AlcornIdaho Supreme Court · 1901
  4. State v. NolanIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  5. State v. Dong SingIdaho Supreme Court · 1922

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. CreechIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. LankfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. AragonIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. WindsorIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. FetterlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API