Legal Opinion
Reeber v. Rossell
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 27, 1950PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
The Court has before it orders to show cause in the above-named actions why the defendants should not be enjoined pending the final hearing and determination of the actions from removing or separating the plaintiffs William N. Reeber and Harry G. Gilbert from their present positions with the Veterans’ Administration or from reducing them in rank or salary. Similar requests for relief by the other plaintiffs in Civil Action No. 58-143 have been adjourned to a later date. Since the facts in the two actions are related, the orders to show cause will be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Williams v. FanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hilton v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- West India Fruit & Steamship Co. v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Fahey v. O'Melveny & Myers Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. O'Melveny & MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- American Federation of Government Employees Afl-Cio), Local 1904, Afge Afl-Cio), Local 1498, Afge Afl-Cio) v. ResorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Jacob v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
- Jeanne M. Murray v. Robert L. Kunzig, Administrator, General ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Dunham v. City of WestminsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.