Legal Opinion
United States v. Sam Accardi
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 10, 1965No. 29234_1PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
The Government offered evidence to prove and the jury could reasonably have found that a narcotics agent, Anthony Zirilli, spoke with co-defendant, Di-Gregorio on January 4, 1955 concerning the purchase of heroin. On the afternoon of January 31, Zirilli met with Di-Gregorio and co-defendant Russo at a Brooklyn restaurant. After some discussion about prices, Zirilli agreed to purchase a one-half kilogram of heroin for $5,000. The transfer of heroin for cash was to be made that evening. During the course of the discussion, Russo indicated that he was not the source of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- United States v. RahmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. William RaglandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Marcia Lyon and Anton LysczykCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Noel Maxwell, William Adams, John Henry Purry, Clarence White and Leonard R. AikenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.