Legal Opinion
Edmund Y. Chein v. Richard Shumsky, Chief Probation Officer, La County California State Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 25, 2004No. 01-56320PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
373 F.3d 978
Edmund Y. CHEIN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Richard SHUMSKY, Chief Probation Officer, LA County; California State Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 01-56320.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted September 16, 2003.
Filed June 25, 2004.
Charles M. Sevilla, Cleary & Sevilla, San Diego, CA, for the petitioner-appellant.
Brentford Ferriera and Matthew G. Monforton, Office of the District Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for the respondents-appellees.
Cliff Gardner, San Francisco, CA, for the amicus curiae.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Thaddaeus Louis Turner v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, San Quentin State Prison Jeanne Woodford, Warden, as Warden of San Quentin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- (HC) Shaw v. High Desert State PrisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- (HC) Wright v. McDowellDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019