Legal Opinion

Seber v. Unger

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 15, 1995No. 94 C 1773PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION . AND ORDER

CASTILLO, District Judge.

Plaintiff Kenneth E. Seber (“Seber”) seeks declaratory and monetary relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983' against the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (“D.E.A.”), unidentified D.E.A. agents John and Jane Does (the “Doe defendants”), the Cook County Sheriffs Office 1 and Seber’s former attorney, Michael A. Unger (“Un-ger”) in connection with the forfeiture of $9,800 in U.S. currency. Seber also appears to assert state-law claims against Defendant Unger.

The D.E.A. moves to dismiss the complaint against it for lack of subject matter…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. District of Columbia v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jung v. Association of American Medical CollegesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  2. Leo Muhammed Antoinette Muhammed v. Drug Enforcement Agency, Asset Forfeiture UnitCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  3. Robert Grimes v. District of Columbia Business Decisions Information, Inc., Welton WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Holt v. DavidsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  5. McGuigan v. ConteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API