Legal Opinion
Eaton v. R. B. George Investments, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 28, 1951No. 14551PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRAMER, Justice.
Mrs. Eaton, joined pro forma by her husband F. W. Eaton, filed this suit in the trial court against R. B. George Investments, Inc., to recover damages growing out of the death of Ginger Dale Ensley, the *190three-ycar-eight-months-old daughter of Mrs. Eaton, who was found dead in a dipping vat on the R. B. George Investments, Inc. farm in Dallas.
The parties will be designated as in the trial court. The plaintiffs’ pleadings alleged that the vat and its surrounding fences, etc., were attractive to children, and then followed in separate paragraphs four specific acts of negligence…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gulf Production Co. v. QuisenberryTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Tipsword v. PotterIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
- Canadian River Gas Co. v. BivinsTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- MacK v. Houston E. & W. T. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Hicks v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eaton v. R. B. George Investment, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1953
- Muniz v. KravisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Arturo R. Moreno, Personal Representative of Oswaldo Moreno, Deceased v. Stahmann Farms, Inc., a New Mexico CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982