Legal Opinion

Amica Mutual Insurance v. Woods

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 19, 1998No. AC 17150PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUPONT, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment for the defendants1 rendered by the trial court in accordance with the report of an attorney trial referee. The attorney trial referee determined that the plaintiff insurance company was not entitled to recover reparations benefits paid to or for the benefit of the defendant Donna Woods, an insured of the plaintiff, and recommended judgment for the defendants.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiffs right to reimbursement for basic reparations benefits paid to the defendant insured was extinguished upon the passage…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Exxon Corp. v. EagertonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. State v. NewtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Meadows v. HigginsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  2. Renz v. Allstate InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Amica Mutual Insurance v. WoodsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. Arzt v. Phoenix Insurance Company, No. Cv96-0323069 S (Oct. 14, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
  5. Integon Insurance v. Wilson, No. Cv96-0408889-S (Feb. 2, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API