Legal Opinion

Mey v. Pep Boys-Manny, Moe & Jack

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 2011No. 101406PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KETCHUM, J.:

The plaintiff below, Diana Mey (“plaintiff’), appeals an order from the Circuit Court of Ohio County, granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff filed a class action complaint alleging that the defendants, The Pep Boys, Southwest Vehicle Management, Inc., and Lanelogic Inc. (“defendants”), violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq., by leaving an automated voicemail message at her residence in response to a classified advertisement that the plaintiffs son…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Templet v. Hydrochem Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  3. Pacific Insurance Company v. American National Fire Insurance Company, Rail Link, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  4. State Ex Rel. McGraw v. Scott Runyan Pontiac-Buick, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Hutchinson v. StatonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. John Terry Malone v. Potomac Highlands Airport AuthorityWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Acord v. COLANE CO.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Hinerman v. RodriguezWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Gary L. Caudill v. CSX TransportationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Anita Cecil v. Bluestone Coal Corp., etc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2014

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API