Legal Opinion

Commodore Commons Condominium Assn. v. Austin, No. 058025 (Mar. 4, 1999)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided March 4, 1999No. 058025UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO STRIKE #132

The plaintiff's Motion to Strike raises the issue whether the defendant may in a lawsuit seeking to foreclose a lien for unpaid condominium charges, assert counter claims and raise special defenses not directly related to payment, discharge, release, satisfaction or invalidity. The court rules that our law does not permit the interposition of such defenses, and grants the Motion to Strike.

The one-count complaint alleges that the plaintiff, pursuant to General Statutes §…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Conn. Savings Bk. v. ReillyConnecticut Superior Court · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Congress Street Condominium Ass'n v. AndersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  2. Congress Street Condominium Ass'n v. AndersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. Congress Street Condominium Ass'n v. AndersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API