Legal Opinion · Dissent

Congress Street Condominium Ass'n v. Anderson

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 20, 2011No. AC 32580Published

1DissentAlvord, J.

I respectfully dissent because I conclude that the trial court properly granted the motion for summary judgment as to liability filed by the plaintiff, Congress Street Condominium Association, Inc., as against the defendant Frederick L. Anderson. 1 The record reflects that the court sustained the plaintiffs objection to the defendant’s second request to amend his answer, which included a special defense of equitable estoppel and a counterclaim, on the same day that it granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. Without the special defense and counterclaim, the court correctly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. VoogSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Journal Publishing Co. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  3. Gaffey v. GaffeyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. Commodore Commons Condominium Assn. v. Austin, No. 058025 (Mar. 4, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API