Rsm Richter, Inc. v. Behr America, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, IN PART
GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This breach of contract/eollection action is presently before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant has responded to Plaintiffs Motion, Plaintiff has replied, and Defendant has sur-replied. Having reviewed and considered the parties’ briefs, supporting evidence, and the entire record of this matter, the Court finds that the pertinent facts and legal contentions are sufficiently presented in these materials, and that oral argument would not assist in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Anthony A. Calderone, Clark Hornbaker, Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Alvery Pack v. Damon Corporation, General R v. CenterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Alan Custom Homes, Inc v. KrolMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- FRANKLIN CAPITAL FUNDING LLC v. VIRIDIS FSM INCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Nelson v. I.Q. Data International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025