Legal Opinion

Nash v. Fries

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1906PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from an order of tbe circuit court for Ashland ■county: JohN K. Paeish, Circuit Judge. Appellant, together with other citizens and freeholders, presented a petition alleging all the facts required by ch. 21, Laws of 1905, for the organization of the town of Shana-golden, in Ashland county, whereupon the court, on motion ■of attorneys for respondent, dismissed said petition, on the ground that sec. 775d (sec. 1, ch. 21, Laws of 1905), under which said petition had been…

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of tbe circuit court for Ashland ■county: JohN K. Paeish, Circuit Judge. Appellant, together with other citizens and freeholders, presented a petition alleging all the facts required by ch. 21, Laws of 1905, for the organization of the town of Shana-golden, in Ashland county, whereupon the court, on motion ■of attorneys for respondent, dismissed said petition, on the ground that sec. 775d (sec. 1, ch. 21, Laws of 1905), under which said petition had been filed, is unconstitutional, from which order Nash, one of the petitioners, appeals. As to the meaning of the word…

1Opinion of the CourtDodge, J.

Ch. 21, Laws of 1905, provides that contiguous territory containing at least a government township, being part of any town or towns and having at least fifty resident electors and an assessed valuation of at least $100,000, may be organized into a town upon compliance with the fol*122lowing three sections. The firs]; of said sections (sec. 775 b) provides for presentation to the circuit court of a petition by a majority of the resident electors and homesteaders of the-proposed territory, correctly describing the same, naming the town or towns of which it is a part, containing the names of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Attorney General v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  3. State ex rel. Lamb v. CunninghamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Dowling v. Lancashire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. In re Incorporation of Village of North MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Dinion Coil Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  2. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. State ex rel. Young v. Duval CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  4. State ex rel. Van Alstine v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  5. City of Beloit v. Town of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API