State v. Baxter
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
MARUMOTO, J.
On. this appeal, appellant, who was convicted of first degree burglary after a jury trial, specifies a number of trial court errors, but the only specification which requires our consideration is the one relating to the instruction admonishing the jury not to draw any inference against him from the fact that he did not testify. 1 The instruction was given at the request of the prosecution and over appellant’s objection.
The court gave the instruction upon construing our statute as mandating it to do so. HRS § 621-15, formerly R.L.H. 1955, § 222-15, provides…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bruno v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. Ralph Garguilo and Joseph MacChiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Becher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
- Hardaway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Commonwealth v. BuielMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Hines v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
- State v. PiperArizona Supreme Court · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.