Legal Opinion
Broadnax v. City of New Haven
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 23, 2007No. SC 17834PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
This appeal is a sequel to our decision in Broadnax v. New Haven, 270 Conn. 133, 851 A.2d 1113 (2004) (Broadnax I). In Broadnax I, we considered the legality, under the city of New Haven’s charter, municipal ordinances and civil service rules and regulations, of the practice of “underfilling” in the New Haven fire department. We concluded that underfilling is not permissible under the city’s governing laws and regulations, and that the trial court had not abused “its discretion by appointing a special master to oversee promotions within the fire department . . . .’’Id., 138.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- In re Valerie D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Andover LP I v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Doe v. DoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Town of Bloomfield v. United Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. ConnorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Town of Groton v. Mardie Lane Homes, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Connecticut Natural Gas Corp. v. Department of Public Utility ControlConnecticut Superior Court · 2009
- In re Jewelyette M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.