Legal Opinion

Guthmiller v. South Dakota Department of Transportation

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1993No. 18032PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

After being injured at work, Harold Guthmiller (Guthmiller) filed a claim for worker’s compensation with his employer, the South Dakota Department of Transportation (DOT). Following a June 4, 1991, administrative hearing by the Department of Labor’s Division of Labor and Management, Guthmiller was awarded permanent total disability benefits. DOT appealed the decision to the Sixth Judicial Circuit which reversed the decision and remanded the matter to reconsider Guthmiller’s entitlement to lesser benefits. Notice of Appeal was filed by Guthmiller on August…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Caldwell v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Waddell v. Dewey County BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Day v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Miller v. StevensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hendrix v. Graham Tire Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Westergren v. Baptist Hospital of WinnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Fanning v. IversenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. First Nat. Bank of Biwabik, MN v. Bank of LemmonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Welch v. Automotive Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API