Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Swanson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1924PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.

In March, 1923, the board of county commissioners of Burleigh county adopted the following resolution:

“Whereas, it has been brought to our attention that large anumnts of taxable property are alleged to have escaped taxation during the last year and previous thereto, and,
“Whereas, one F. O. Ilellstrom has been instrumental in calling this matter to our attention and has compiled and brought certain data before us in relation thereto,
“Therefore, be it resolved that the said F. O. ITellstrom be employed to assist the state’s attorney in investigating said matter, not only those who are now…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Workman v. GoldthaitIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Stevens v. County of HenryIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Chase v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  4. Grannis v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. Storey v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hunt Oil Co. v. KerbaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Simpson v. Silver Bow CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. In Re the Appeal of Morris U.S.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Schwartzenberger v. McKenzie County Board of County CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Burchard v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API