Legal Opinion

Storey v. Murphy

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1899PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Kidder Count; Winchester, J. Action by John Storey against John W. Murphy and others and the State of North Dakota, intervener, to restrain- defendants, as county commissioners, from paying defendants Fred A. Baker and Charles FI. Stanley for services rendered by them as attorneys. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWallin, J.

In this action, which is brought for equitable relief, the plaintiff, by his complaint, prays for a permanent injunction restraining said defandants, the County of Kidder and its' commissioners, from disbursing or paying over to said other defendants, Fred A. Baker and Charles H. Stanley, or to either of them, any money or county warrant, or transferring to them any land on account of professional services rendered by said Banker and Stanley, or either of them, pursuant to a certain contract, which is hereafter referred to and set out; and plaintiff further prays that said contract be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Northern Bank of Toledo v. Porter Township TrusteesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Engstad v. DinnieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Trester v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Cullen v. Town of CarthageIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. McHenry v. Kidder CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State Center, LLC v. Lexington Charles Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. Lang v. City of CavalierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State ex rel. Workman v. GoldthaitIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Herr v. RudolfNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Stevens v. County of HenryIllinois Supreme Court · 1905

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API