Legal Opinion
Burchard v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 31, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bueiíe, Ch. J.
This is an action to recover compensation for services.
The plaintiff who is engaged in business, under the style and firm name of F. F. Burchard & Company, is a licensed and practicing public accountant; and on the sixteenth of March, 1927, the Dalphin School District, No. 17, Divide county, in the state of North Dakota, had on file a claim with the bonding fund, for shortages arising from the irregularity and shortages of one O. E. Long, who was bonded by the said fund as the treasurer of said school district; that on the said sixteenth day of March, 1927, the state bonding…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State ex rel. Workman v. GoldthaitIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Fancher v. Board of CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
- Stevens v. County of HenryIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Chase v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Grannis v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- MacDougall v. Board of Land Com'rs.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1935
- Cornell v. HarrisIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
- Ward v. Brown CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943