Legal Opinion

State v. Arthur

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1956No. 218PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, C. J.

Perjury, as defined by common law and enlarged by statute in this State, G.S. 14-209, is “a false statement under oath, knowingly, willfully and designedly made, in a proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction, or concerning a matter wherein the affiant is required by law to be sworn, as to some matter material to the issue or point in question.” S. v. Smith, 230 N.C. 198, 52 S.E. 2d 348, and cases there cited. See also S. v. Sailor, 240 N.C. 113, 81 S.E. 2d 191.

And in a prosecution for perjury it is required that the falsity of the oath be established by the testimony of two witnesses,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. . RhinehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. State v. SailorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. State v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. State v. . WebbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Henry v. DeenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Hill v. Winn-Dixie Charlotte, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. LucasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. State v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. State v. ChaneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API