Legal Opinion

David Wallace & Co. v. Bogel & Bro.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1886No. Case No. 1955PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Marion. Tried below before the Hon. W. P. McLean. This case was before the supreme court at a former term and was reported in 62 Tex., 636. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Willie, Chief Justice.

This was a trial of the right of property in a stock of goods, in which Wallace So Co. were plaintiffs, and Bogel & Bro., claimants, and judgment was rendered for the claimants, the *573cause having been submitted to the court upon both the law and the facts. Plaintiffs had sued out a writ of attachment against Crittenden & Kibbe, which was levied upon a stock of goods found in the possession of Bogel & Bro., and which they claimed tinder an assignment from the defendants in the attachment. The plaintiffs’ theory was that Bogel So Bro. had knowingly received from Crittenden…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Betancourt v. EberlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Lowry v. McGeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Patton & Shaver v. Elk River Navigation Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Dwyer v. TestardTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Young v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1859

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Focke, Wilkens & Lange & Scott v. Leon & BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Baker v. Pitluk & MeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Harris v. DaughertyTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Lount v. HolladayArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Lewis v. DenisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API