David Wallace & Co. v. Bogel & Bro.
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Marion. Tried below before the Hon. W. P. McLean. This case was before the supreme court at a former term and was reported in 62 Tex., 636. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Willie, Chief Justice.
This was a trial of the right of property in a stock of goods, in which Wallace So Co. were plaintiffs, and Bogel & Bro., claimants, and judgment was rendered for the claimants, the *573cause having been submitted to the court upon both the law and the facts. Plaintiffs had sued out a writ of attachment against Crittenden & Kibbe, which was levied upon a stock of goods found in the possession of Bogel & Bro., and which they claimed tinder an assignment from the defendants in the attachment. The plaintiffs’ theory was that Bogel So Bro. had knowingly received from Crittenden…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Betancourt v. EberlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Lowry v. McGeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Patton & Shaver v. Elk River Navigation Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1878
- Dwyer v. TestardTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Young v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1859
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Focke, Wilkens & Lange & Scott v. Leon & BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Baker v. Pitluk & MeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1918
- Harris v. DaughertyTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Lount v. HolladayArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Lewis v. DenisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.