Ramsey v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Ford, Judge:
The merchandise covered by the suit listed above was classified by the collector as “Parts of embroidered cotton wearing apparel” and duty was levied thereon at the rate of 90 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 1529 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The plaintiff claims said merchandise to be properly dutiable at 75 per centum ad valorem under said paragraph 1529 (a), as modified by the trade agreement with France, 69 Treas. Dec. 853, T. D. 48316, as articles of wearing apparel, finished or unfinished, wholly or in chief value of cotton, embroidered.
At the trial,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. Cartier (Inc.)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- Nyman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- In re MillsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1893
- United States v. Chesterton Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Paramount Import Export Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- United States v. RamseyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955