Legal Opinion

Davis v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 4, 1997No. 95-CF-1281PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUIZ, Associate Judge:

Found guilty by a jury of kidnapping and robbery, Darryl Davis raises several issues on appeal, none of which we find warrants reversal. Davis claims that the introduction of a plastic pistol obtained from him at a date seven weeks after the incident for which he was charged wrongfully suggested Davis’s criminal predisposition to the jury. He further alleges that the Winters anti-deadlock instruction given to the jury coerced a verdict. We affirm.

Davis was originally charged with armed robbery, kidnapping while armed, and possession of a firearm or imitation firearm…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Winters v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. United States v. Glenn Dale SeawellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cook v. Edgewood Management Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Burgess v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Reyes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Shotikare v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API