Legal Opinion

People v. Teague

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 7, 1966No. Gen. 50,051PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burman

The defendant, John Teague, was charged in separate indictments with the offenses of rape and robbery. After a jury trial, he was found guilty and sentenced to a term of not less than thirty nor more than sixty years in the penitentiary. On this appeal, he seeks a reversal of his convictions on the grounds that the indictments did not specify the time and place of the offenses with the degree of definiteness required by statute, and therefore did not properly state the offenses of rape and robbery. In the alternative, he seeks a new trial, contending primarily that the misconduct of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. AlcaldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. The PEOPLE v. DonaldIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  3. The People v. GambonyIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  4. People v. SpauldingIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  5. The People v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. HolmesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. People v. GregoryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  3. People v. StackerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. People v. TeagueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API