Legal Opinion

Salisbury v. Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 22, 1937No. Appeal No. 1; Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

These appeals present for review two orders made at Special Term in a mandamus proceeding. One order appealed from denies petitioner’s application for peremptory and alternative mandamus orders to compel official action, with respect to a high*225way and bridge, by certain public officials of the county of Ontario and the town of Phelps in said county. The second order appealed from denies the application of several taxpayers residing in said town for leave to intervene as party petitioners in the mandamus proceeding.

A brief statement of the facts upon which petitioner bases his right to relief…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Greathouse v. DernSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. People Ex Rel. Wood v. Board of Assessors & Collector of TaxesNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Williams v. PyrkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  4. People ex rel. De Groat v. MarletteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. People ex rel. Schuyler v. Town of AngelicaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hunke v. FooteIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Fay v. LyonsNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Fay v. LyonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  4. Fiorini v. ParkhurstNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Hallenbeck v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API