Legal Opinion

Fay v. Lyons

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1952PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBookstein, J.

This proceeding, brought pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, seeks a direction to the defendants to pay to the petitioner his full salary in the position of industrial foreman in the State Department of Correction from April 21, 1948, to June 5, 1951, a period during which the petitioner was on suspension without pay, and during which time he performed no services for the State.

The petitioner’s suspension was followed five days later by a confession of his guilt in having participated in an alleged conspiracy with another State employee in improperly conducting business with the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Matter of Coombs v. EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Croghan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  3. Amsterdam City Hospital v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  4. Williams v. PyrkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  5. DeLack v. GreeneNew York Supreme Court · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bentley v. HenningerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  2. Schmidt v. MacedonioNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Rice v. Board of Education of Central High School District No. 2New York Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Amkraut v. HultsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  5. Catone v. HopkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API