Legal Opinion

State v. BIGHOUSE

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 20, 2009No. C033240CR, C040163CR, C041507CR, A126980 (Control), A126981, A126982Published

1Opinion of the Court

209 P.3d 356 (2009)

228 Or. App. 528

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Richard Carl BIGHOUSE, aka Richard Earl Bighouse, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. C033240CR, C040163CR, C041507CR, A126980 (Control), A126981, A126982.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, En Banc.

On Respondent's Petition for Reconsideration March 19, 2009.

Decided May 20, 2009.

John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Erika L. Hadlock, Acting Solicitor General, and Paul L. Smith, Assistant Attorney-in-Charge, for petition.

Before BREWER, Chief Judge, and EDMONDS, LANDAU, HASELTON, ARMSTRONG, WOLLHEIM, SCHUMAN, ORTEGA, ROSENBLUM, and SERCOMBE,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oregon v. IceSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. State v. BighouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. BighouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API