Legal Opinion

PYR Energy Corp. v. Samson Resources Co.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided September 15, 2006No. 1:05-CV-530PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HINES, United States Magistrate Judge.

This opinion states reasons and rationale for the court’s decision on competing motions for summary judgment, 1 specifically, a “Motion for Summary Judgment of Samson Lone Star Limited Partnership and Samson Resources Company” and “Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.” Docket Nos. 30 and 95, respectively-

I. PARTIES; NATURE OP SUIT

Plaintiff, PYR Energy Corporation (PYR), is a publicly traded company organized and registered under laws of Maryland, with headquarters and principal place of business…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Rogers v. Ricane Enterprises, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. HECI Exploration Co. v. NeelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. City of Pinehurst v. Spooner Addition Water Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1968

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. PYR Energy Corp. v. Samson Resources Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2007
  2. Ivarene and Victor Hosek v. Rosale Scott, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
  3. Peak Health Center v. DorfmanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API