Legal Opinion

PYR Energy Corp. v. Samson Resources Co.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided January 10, 2007No. 1:05-CV-530PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTIONS FOR CLARIFICATION, RECONSIDERATION AND REHEARING

HINES, United States Magistrate Judge.

On September 15, 2006, the court issued its ruling, accompanied by a memorandum opinion, on the parties’ competing motions for summary judgment. 1 The court partially granted and partially denied each motion, while reserving other issues for trial. Both parties subsequently moved the court to reconsider, rehear, or clarify aspects of the court’s ruling, especially points decided adversely to that party. This opinion addresses these motions to the extent they warrant further…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lehman Brothers v. ScheinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Rogers v. Ricane Enterprises, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Manges v. GuerraTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Abraxas Petroleum Corp. v. Hornburg, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Coates v. Brazoria County TexasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
  2. Bradshaw v. Steadfast Financial, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2013
  3. Betty Lou Bradshaw v. Steadfast Financial, L.L.C., R.J. Sikes, Roger Sikes, Kathy SIkes, Greg Louvier, Pam Louvier, Christy Rome, Dacota Investment Holdings, L.L.P., A/K/A Dacota Investment Holdings, L.P., Range Production I, L.P., Range Resources Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013
  4. Betty Lou Bradshaw v. Steadfast Financial, L.L.C., R.J. Sikes, Roger Sikes, Kathy SIkes, Greg Louvier, Pam Louvier, Christy Rome, Dacota Investment Holdings, L.L.P., A/K/A Dacota Investment Holdings, L.P., Range Production I, L.P., Range Resources Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013
  5. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co. v. BIOTECH PHARMACY, INC.District Court, D. Nevada · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API