Legal Opinion
C.W. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided May 25, 2001No. S-9642PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Finding that C.W. had abandoned his young child, J.S., the superior court terminated C.W.'s parental rights. C.W. argues that termination violated the Children in Need of Aid (CINA) statute and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). He claims that the State of Alaska violated the CINA statute by failing to make reasonable efforts to reunite him with his son, and violated the ADA by failing to provide alcohol treatment services that reasonably accommodated his allegedly substantial learning disability. We reject these arguments because, even assuming…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ricky Crawford v. Indiana Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Duffy v. RivelandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Melinda Erickson, United States of America, Intervenor v. Board of Governors of State Colleges and Universities for Northeastern Illinois UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- N.A. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- M.W. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- David S. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Thea G. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Jude M. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Grace L. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Ralph H. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.