Legal Opinion
M.W. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided April 20, 2001No. S-9557PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Justice.
I, INTRODUCTION
Mark W. appeals the superior court's termination of his parental rights to his daughter, Michelle. 1 The superior court determined that Michelle was a child in need of aid because she had been abandoned by Mark; that Mark failed, within a reasonable time, to remedy the conduct or conditions that placed Michelle at a substantial risk of harm; that the Department of Health & Human Services made reasonable efforts to provide family remedial services; and that it was in Michelle's best interests to terminate Mark's parental rights. Because the record supports…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- A.A. v. State, Department of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- D.M. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- A.M. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- A.B. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
3Cited by26 opinions
- Brynna B. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- David S. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Dale H. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Erica A. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Karrie B. Ex Rel. Reep v. CATHERINE J.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.