Legal Opinion
Niakan v. Samaan
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 16, 1988No. B015459PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS, J. *
Defendant/appellant Issa Elias Samaan (appellant) appeals from the judgment entered against him and in favor of plaintiffs/respondents F. Niakan, E. Niakan, Ben Niakan and Betty Niakan (the Niakans) and Union Oil Company of California (Union Oil), and from denial of his motion for a new trial.
FACTS:
In 1963, Union Oil 1 leased a service station site on Wilshire Boulevard in Los Angeles from the Sheffields and constructed a Union Oil Station facility on the site. The original term of the lease expired on April 30, 1979. The lease contained options to extend the lease for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- California Arco Distributors, Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Rustom v. Atlantic Richfield Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1985
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
3Cited by2 opinions
- Union Oil Co. v. O'RILEYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Grotemyer v. Lake Shore Petro Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992