State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. Day
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.
The present posture of this case is such that the court is now asked to reconsider and redecide the decisive question presented on the first demurrer.
The entire difficulty here encountered is due to failure to remember and observe one of the most important fundamentals of the law, namely, that a court of record speaks through its journal. This principle has been repeatedly and consistently followed by this court. Will v. McCoy, 135 Ohio St., 241, 20 N. E. (2d), 371; Industrial Commission v. Musselli, 102 Ohio St., 10, 130 N. E., 32; State, ex rel. Voight, v. Lueders, Judge, 101 Ohio St., 256,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Will v. McCoyOhio Supreme Court · 1939
3Cited by41 opinions
- Horner v. Toledo HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Dailey v. Craigmyle & Son Farms, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Elser v. ParkeOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. BensonOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
- Marra Constructors, Inc. v. Cleveland Metroparks SystemOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.