Legal Opinion · Dissent

4501 Northpoint LP v. Maricopa County

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 8, 2005No. 1 CA-TX 02-0027Published

1DissentWinthrop, Judge

¶ 20 The majority today holds that a judgment, properly entered pursuant to Rule 58, Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, and awarding substantive, affirmative relief to the Taxpayer, does not constitute an “adjudication on the merits” such that the Taxpayer qualifies to request an award of attorneys’ fees pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-348(B). I disagree with such holding, and respectfully dissent.

*565¶ 21 As a starting point, we recognize that, in enacting § 12-348, the legislature intended “to reduce the economic deterrents individuals faced in contesting governmental actions, magnified by the disparity…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fairmont Aluminum Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
  2. Chaney Building Co. v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Wilderness World, Inc. v. Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Wieland v. Danner Auto Supply, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  5. Arizona Tax Research Ass'n v. Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API