Legal Opinion

People v. Cabo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We reject the defendant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. Although his trial counsel failed to make a motion to suppress the physical evidence, it is settled that "a failure to move to suppress physical evidence does not, in and of itself, establish the ineffective assistance of counsel” (People v Taylor, 157 AD2d 617, 618; see also, People v De Mauro, 48 NY2d 892; People v Allen, 193 AD2d 609, lv denied 82 NY2d 890). Here, the record indicates that there was no colorable basis for a suppression motion (see, People v Garcia, 75 NY2d 973; People v Allen,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. GarciaNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. People v. De MauroNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. FieldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. People v. DeLeonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. People v. HutzenlaubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API