Legal Opinion

United States v. Jimenez-Alvarado

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 15, 2009No. 07-50514PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Memorandum Disposition previously filed on December 15, 2008, and appear*480ing in 303 Fed.Appx. 478, is withdrawn, and the Memorandum disposition filed with this Order is filed in its stead. The following amendment was made:

1. Following the paragraph ending on Page 6, line 1, insert the following additional paragraph:

Jimenez-Alvarado, however, argues that a 16-level enhancement is not supported under the modified categorical approach because his charging documents included rape committed by means of “fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury,” which does not meet this circuit’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. VidalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. SnellenbergerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Andrew SandeenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API