Legal Opinion

Canton Structural Steel Co. v. Lindley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1982No. 81-348PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The instant appeal concerns the proper construction of R. C. 5739.03, which states in pertinent part:

“If any sale is claimed to be exempt under division (E) of section 5739.01 of the Revised Code or under section 5739.02 of the Revised Code, with the exception of divisions (B) (1) to (B) (11) of section 5739.02, the consumer must furnish to the vendor, and the vendor must obtain from the consumer, a certificate specifying the reason that the sale is not legally subject to the tax. If the transaction is claimed to be exempt under division (B) (13) of section 5739.02 of the Revised Code, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Union Metal Mfg. Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. American Handling Equipment Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Dayton Sash & Door Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Jones v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frankelite Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Stotts-Friedman Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. H. C. Attebery & Associates Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API