Legal Opinion

Stotts-Friedman Co. v. Lindley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1982No. 81-866PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

I

In this cause we must resolve the question of whether a vendee’s purchase order constitutes the equivalent of an exemption certificate for purposes of R. C. 5739.03. That section states in pertinent part:

“If any sale is claimed to be exempt under division (E) of section 5739.01 of the Revised Code or under section 5739.02 of the Revised Code, with the exception of divisions (B)(1) to (B)(ll) of section 5739.02, the consumer must furnish to the vendor, and the vendor must obtain from the consumer, a certificate specifying the reason that the sale is not legally subject to the tax. If the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Union Metal Mfg. Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. American Handling Equipment Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Dayton Sash & Door Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Canton Structural Steel Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Tractor Supply Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barry Equipment Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Chemetron Corp. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Paul Ford, Inc. v. RupeOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API