Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hodges
The appeals in the above captioned cases have been consolidated as both present issues regarding Decision No. 86103 of the Public Utilities Commission (PUC). Portions of this decision were challenged in the trial court by the appellants, Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company (Mountain Bell) and by the Colorado Municipal League (League). The district court, which also considered the issues presented in each case on a consolidated basis, affirmed the PUC decision. We affirm the district court’s judgment.
Mountain Bell sought higher rates when it filed with the PUC its advice letter…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
- Miller Bros., Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- City of Montrose v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COM'N, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Lake Durango Water Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.