Legal Opinion

Lake Durango Water Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 7, 2003No. 02SA100PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez

I. Introduction

This case is before this court for review of the district court's decision affirming an award by the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) of attorney's fees and costs to Duran-go West Metropolitan District No. 1 (the District) for expenses incurred during related proceedings between the District and Lake Durango Water Company (Lake Du-rango). Lake Durango challenges the award on three bases. First, Lake Durango argues that the award is unconstitutional because it is both retrospective legislation and a taking. Second, Lake Durango asserts that recovery of attorney's fees and costs…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Eastern Enterprises v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Dorman v. Petrol Aspen, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. Fibreglas Fabricators, Inc. v. KylbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. USI Properties East, Inc. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. Kirk v. Denver Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  2. East Ridge of Fort Collins, LLC v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. Lawry v. PalmColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. City of GoldenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  5. City of Golden v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API