Ash v. Great Lakes Greyhound Lines
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Carr, J..
Plaintiff received an award of compensation for disability resulting from hernia. Defendants have appealed, asserting that there was no evidence before the workmen’s compensation commission on which to base a finding that such hernia was recent in origin or that it resulted from strain arising out of and in the course of plaintiff’s employment. Reliance is placed on the following proviso appearing in part 7, § 1(c) (CL 1948, § 417.1 [Stat Ann 1950 Rev § 17.220]), of the workmen’s compensation law : *
“Provided, however, That a hernia to be compensable must be clearly recent in origin…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ginsberg v. Burroughs Adding Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Marman v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Draper v. Regents of UniversityMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Riley v. KohlenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Pucilowski v. Packard Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. AtleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- White v. Revere Copper & Brass, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
- Johnson v. Vibradamp Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- White v. Revere Copper & Brass, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Collins v. Lord's Furniture & Appliance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.