Hangsterfer v. Shafer
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Rohnert, J. Assumpsit by J. William Hangsterfer against Charles A. Shafer and Wilber S. Peck for a breach of the terms •of a lease. From a judgment for defendants on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This suit was brought in the circuit court. A bill of particulars was filed, which stated, after the formal heading:
“Take notice that the following is a bill of particulars of the plaintiff’s claim, for which suit is brought:
“ The following articles of furniture, fixtures, including soda fountain, purchased under the terms of contract sued upon:
Soda fountain__________1..............'.......— $2,200 00
William Wright & Co., bill of fixtures------------- 791 20.”
Then followed 20 other items for fixtures and equipments connected with the soda fountain, the total of the items being about $4,500.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thompson v. HowardMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Foster v. RowleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Merrill v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Thomas v. WattMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Horner v. FellowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1843