Legal Opinion

People v. McGowan

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 2015No. B263026PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KIRSCHNER, J.*

Penal Code section 9911 permits an in-custody defendant to require the arraigning magistrate to determine whether there is probable cause to believe the defendant committed a public offense. (§ 991, subd. (a).) If the magistrate finds no such probable cause, the defendant is entitled to dismissal of the complaint. (§ 991, subd. (d).) The issue raised in this appeal is whether section 991 vests the trial court with authority to dismiss only some of the charges for lack of probable cause, or whether it must dismiss the complaint in its entirety or not at all. We conclude…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Kellett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. People v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. People v. Jovan B.California Supreme Court · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. Thuy Le TruongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. People v. VasquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. People v. CHR Herbal RemediesCalifornia Superior Court · 2017
  4. People v. BarajasCalifornia Superior Court · 2018
  5. Barajas v. Appellate DivisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API