Legal Opinion

United States v. Martinez-Gaytan

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 5, 2000No. 99-50559PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:

The instant case requires us to decide under what circumstances a translated confession is insufficiently reliable to excuse the translator’s absence from a suppression hearing. We hold that where the particular facts of a case cast significant doubt upon the accuracy of a translated confession, the translator or a witness who heard and understood the untranslated confession must be available for testimony and cross-examination at the suppression hearing before the confession can be admitted. We vacate the district court’s denial of Appellant’s suppression…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Garcia AbregoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Jaleh NazemianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Hugo Lopez, Juan Trujillo and Hernando VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. CorderoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Cardoza-HinojosaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. United States v. VidacakCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  2. Barhoumi v. ObamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. Ivan CurbeloCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  4. Correa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Latif v. ObamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API