Legal Opinion

United States v. Cardoza-Hinojosa

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 29, 1998No. 97-40290PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Circuit Judge:

Ramiro Cardoza-Hinojosa (“Hinojosa”) appeals his conviction, entered pursuant to a conditional plea of guilty, for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. He alleges that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress cocaine that was discovered in a shed located between his home and an auto repair shop.

Contending that he pays property taxes on the shed and that he operates a part-time welding business therefrom, Hinojosa asserts an expectation of privacy in the shed’s enclosed area which he claims was unconstitutionally infringed by narcotics…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Mancusi v. DeForteSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Illinois v. AndreasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. Daniel Michael KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Darlie Kee Darin Routier v. City of Rowlett Texas Jimmy Ray Patterson Chris Frosch Greg Davis, Assistant District Attorney for Dallas CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. FinleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  3. State of Texas v. Granville, AnthonyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  4. United States v. VegaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Robert Beam Runyan, United States of America v. Robert Beam RunyanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API