United States v. Cardoza-Hinojosa
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Circuit Judge:
Ramiro Cardoza-Hinojosa (“Hinojosa”) appeals his conviction, entered pursuant to a conditional plea of guilty, for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. He alleges that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress cocaine that was discovered in a shed located between his home and an auto repair shop.
Contending that he pays property taxes on the shed and that he operates a part-time welding business therefrom, Hinojosa asserts an expectation of privacy in the shed’s enclosed area which he claims was unconstitutionally infringed by narcotics…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mancusi v. DeForteSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. AndreasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Daniel Michael KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Darlie Kee Darin Routier v. City of Rowlett Texas Jimmy Ray Patterson Chris Frosch Greg Davis, Assistant District Attorney for Dallas CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. FinleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- State of Texas v. Granville, AnthonyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- United States v. VegaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Robert Beam Runyan, United States of America v. Robert Beam RunyanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.