State Freeling, Atty. Gen. v. Kight, County Judge
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Original mandamus by the State, on the relation of S. P. Freeling, Attorney General, against H. Tom Kight, County Judge of Rogers County, Okla.
1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.
The state, upon the relation of the Attorney General, files an original petition in this court for a writ of mandamus, directed to the defendant, Hon. H. Tom Kight, as the duly elected, qualified and acting county judge of Rogers county, Okla., commanding him, as such county judge, to observe and obey certain rules of procedure in probate matters (other than rule 10, which has been superseded by statute) adopted by the Justices of the Supreme Court, on June 11, 1914, to be effective on the 15th day of July, 1914; which said rules by their terrqfe were made applicable to Rogers county. Upon…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Attorney General v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- State ex rel. Fourth National Bank of Philadelphia v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Jackson Ex Dem. Astor v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- State ex rel. Whiteside v. First Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1900
- People v. RichmondSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- McDunn v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
- DUTTON v. CITY OF MIDWEST CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Winona Oil Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Ingram v. Oneok, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Board of Com'rs of Harmon Cty. v. KeenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.