Legal Opinion
Roneker v. Kenworth Truck Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided August 20, 1997No. 1:95-cr-00125PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
The parties have consented to have the undersigned conduct all further proceedings in this matter, including entry of judgment, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(e). Defendants Kenworth Truck Company (“Ken-worth”) and Detroit Diesel Corp. (“DDC”) have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the following reasons, defendants’ motions are granted.
BACKGROUND
The factual and procedural background of this action has been set forth at length in this court’s decision and order in which it…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kenford Co. v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- American Electric Power Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. New York City Human Resources AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Petroleo Brasileiro, SA, Petro. v. Ameropan Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1974
- Ebasco Services, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- KSW Mechanical Services v. Johnson Controls, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Bennu Oil & Gas, LLC v. Bluewater Industries, L.P. (In re ATP Oil & Gas Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
- Niedermeier v. FCA US LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2024