Legal Opinion
Petroleo Brasileiro, SA, Petro. v. Ameropan Oil Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 21, 1974No. 73 C 1158PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEAHER, District Judge.
Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment in this diversity action to recover the unpaid balance of the purchase price for goods sold and delivered to defendant, asserting that all facts requisite for judgment stand admitted or are incontrovertible.
Plaintiff, a Brazilian corporation maintaining its principal office in Rio de Janeiro, is engaged in world-wide operations in all phases of the petroleum industry. It also has a branch office in New York City. Defendant, a New York corporation based in Syosset, Long Island, is engaged in buying, selling and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kern County Land Co. v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mary Elizabeth Foy Donnelly v. H. Gibson GuionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Roslyn Friedman, Individually and for All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. William MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Abrams v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Haughey v. Belmont Quadrangle Drilling Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
3Cited by48 opinions
- Doe v. United States Civil Service CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Nobs Chemical, U.S.A., Inc. And Calmon-Hill Trading Corp., Cross-Appellees v. Koppers Co., Inc., Cross-Appellant, Schenectady Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Sprague v. Sumitomo Forestry Co., Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
- Ebasco Services, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Hardwick Properties, Inc. v. NewbernDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.