Legal Opinion

Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley Railroad v. Hagblad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1904No. 13,623PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to the district court for. Holt county: William H. Westover, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Letton, C.

This action was brought by Axsel ITagblad, defendant in error, hereinafter styled the plaintiff', against the Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley Railroad Company, plaintiff in error, hereinafter styled the defendant. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff below, and the defendant below brings error to this court. The sole error as*775signed is that the trial court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion for a judgment on the pleading non obstante veredicto. The defendant, by a general demurrer, by seasonable objection to the introduction of evidence upon that ground, by motion for…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Gaynor v. Old Colony & Newport Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Lafflin v. . Buffalo Southwestern R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Kelly v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. McDonald v. Chicago & N. W. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1868

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Davis v. South Side Elevated RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Maniaci v. Interurban Express Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  3. Pere Marquette Railroad v. StrangeIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Wiley v. Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1913
  5. Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. DixonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API