Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1882PublishedCited by 48 opinions

Appeal frovi Pettis Circuit Court. — Hon. William T. Wood, J udge.

1Opinion of the CourtHenry, J.

This suit was to recover damages for thé killing of a horse by defendant’s locomotive engine and ears, and the petition alleges that: “Defendant so carelessly and negligently ran and managed its locomotive engine and cars, on its railroad, as to run against and over said horse, thereby killing him.” Defendant objected to any evidence on the part of plaintiff, “ because the petition does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action,” This objection was overruled. That the petition is sufficient in such a case, has been repeatedly held by this court. Meyer v. Atlantic & Pacific R.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Waldhier v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  2. Meyer v. Atlantic & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. McManamee v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  2. Cederson v. Oregon Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Morgan v. MulhallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  4. Gayle v. Missouri Car & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  5. Mack v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1883

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API