State v. Dort
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBINSON, J.
The defendant, Joel Dort, appeals from the trial court’s judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of kidnapping in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-92 (a) (2) (C) and burglary in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-101 (a) (2). On appeal, the defendant claims that the court erred in denying defense counsel’s request for a *403second competency examination.1 We conclude that the court erred by conducting an inadequate inquiry into the defendant’s competence, and, therefore, reverse the defendant’s conviction.
The jury could have…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. DesLaurierSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. SilvaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. DortSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
- State v. JordanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014